Skopunkten

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Sweden

Skopunkten is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Skopunkten sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Skopunkten is owned by NilsonGroup.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Skopunkten “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it uses any lower-impact materials.
  • It follows an unsustainable fast fashion model due to its consistently low price points and regular heavy discounts
  • It opts for sea freight shipping over air freight to reduce its climate impacts.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Skopunkten “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It sources most of its final stage of production from countries with high risk of labour abuse.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
  • It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Skopunkten “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It has a formal policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.
  • It appears to use leather.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
  • It uses few animal-derived materials.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Skopunkten “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-07-29