Stone By Stone

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Portugal

Stone By Stone sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Unfortunately, Stone By Stone does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Stone By Stone “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It doesn't disclose where all of its final production stage occurs.
  • It traces some of its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Stone By Stone “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather.
  • It doesn’t appear to use wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal hair or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Stone By Stone “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-02-20