Warner's

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: United States

Warner's is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Warner's sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

3 out of 5

Animals

Not applicable

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Warner's is owned by PVH Corp.

Its environment rating is it's a start. It does not use eco-friendly materials. It has set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated from its own operations and supply chain but there is no evidence it is on track to meet its target. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste when manufacturing its products. It has set a deadline to eliminate hazardous chemicals by 2025 but there is no evidence it is on track to meet its target.

Its labour rating is it's a start. Little of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 51-60% in the 2022 Fashion Transparency Index. It provides women empowerment programs in its supply chain. It has a project to improve wages in its supply chain but there is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage. It discloses policies to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

This brand makes products that are generally free of animal materials so it is not applicable to rate its impact on animals. We calculate the overall rating from environment and labour scores only.

Warner's is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Last updated October 2022