Image credit: Wild Country

Wild Country

Rated: It's a start

price: $$$$

location: Italy

Wild Country has good policies to monitor its suppliers but is not taking adequate steps to manage its greenhouse gas emissions.

Wild Country sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

3 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: It's a start

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Wild Country is owned by Oberalp Group.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Wild Country “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
  • It uses renewable energy in its direct operations (such as stores or offices) but not in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Wild Country “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Wild Country “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It has a policy to source wool from non-mulesed sheep but doesn’t provide any evidence to verify its claims.
  • It doesn’t appear to use leather, down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.
  • It uses few animal-derived materials.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Wild Country “It's a Start” overall.

Last updated January 2024