A.S.Adventure

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Belgium

A.S.Adventure is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

A.S.Adventure sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


A.S.Adventure is owned by Yonderland.

A.S.Adventure's rating applies to the A.S.Adventure house apparel brands only and doesn’t apply to other product categories. Check the individual ratings to learn about the other brands that A.S.Adventure stocks.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate A.S.Adventure “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact materials incluidng recycled materials.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking any action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate A.S.Adventure “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • Some of its supply chain is audited by Business Social Compliance Initiative Code of Conduct - BSCI.
  • There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate A.S.Adventure “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It’s published a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use leather, exotic animal hair, and silk.
  • Responsible Wool Standard certifies some of the wool it sources.
  • Responsible Down Standard certifies some of the down it uses.
  • It doesn’t appear to use fur, angora, or exotic animal skin.
  • It traces some animal-derived materials to the first production stage.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate A.S.Adventure “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated August 2023