Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate BRAX “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- It uses some lower-impact materials, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
- There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce its climate impacts.
- It uses some recycled packaging.
- It implements water reduction initiatives in some of its supply chain
- There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate BRAX “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- Much of its final stage is located in low risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
- Its entire final production stage is certified by Business Social Compliance Initiative Code of Conduct - BSCI.
- Its Code of Conduct covers ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
- There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
- During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.
Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate BRAX “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
- It states that it sources wool from non-mulesed sheep.
- It doesn’t appear to use leather, shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate BRAX “Not Good Enough” overall.