Daniel Wellington
Rated: Not good enough
Last rated: Mar 2022
price:location: Sweden
Daniel Wellington is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.
Daniel Wellington sustainability rating
Suggest a rating update
Planet
People
Animals
Overall rating: Not good enough
Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate
Daniel Wellington's environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste when manufacturing its products.
Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. Some of its supply chain is audited by Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit - SMETA Best Practice Guidance. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It traces most of its supply chain including all of the final stage of production. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.
Its animal rating is it's a start. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather. It does not use wool, down, fur, exotic animal skin or exotic animal hair. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.
Daniel Wellington is rated 'not good enough' overall.
Rated Mar 2022
Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.
