Earl of East

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Sep 2023

price:
$$$$

location: United Kingdom

Earl of East does not communicate sufficient information about its environmental and labour policies.

Earl of East sustainability rating

This brand was last rated September 2023. The assessment is likely outdated.
Suggest a rating update

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Earl of East “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses a medium proportion of lower-impact materials including organic cotton.
  • It uses lower impact materials, but there’s no evidence it’s taking further action to reduce its energy use or greenhouse gas emissions.
  • There’s no evidence it minimises textile waste in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Unfortunately, Earl of East does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Earl of East “Good”. It doesn’t appear to use animal-derived materials but doesn’t claim to be a vegan brand.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Earl of East “Not Good Enough” overall.

Rated Sep 2023

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.