ERAM
Rated: Not good enough
price:location: France
ERAM is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.
ERAM sustainability rating
Planet
People
Animals
Overall rating: Not good enough
Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate
ERAM is owned by ERAM Group.
Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ERAM “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- It uses few lower-impact materials, and it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
- It opts for sea freight shipping over air freight to reduce its climate impacts.
- There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
- There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ERAM “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- Some of its final stage is located in low risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
- There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
- Its Code of Conduct covers ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
- It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
- There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
- During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.
Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate ERAM “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
- It appears to use leather.
- It doesn’t appear to use shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ERAM “Not Good Enough” overall.
