Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: Japan

Mizuno is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

Mizuno sustainability rating


2 out of 5


2 out of 5


2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate

Mizuno's environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. It has set an intensity target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated from its supply chain but it is unclear if it is on track to meet it. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. None of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 21-30% in the 2021 Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has an animal welfare policy. It uses leather, down and wool. It does not use fur, down, exotic animal hair, angora or exotic animal skin. It traces some animal products to the first stage of production.

Mizuno is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated January 2022