Natalija

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Natalija “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses some lower-impact materials including deadstock materials.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
• It uses compostable packaging.
• To minimise waste, its products are made-to-order.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Natalija “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• Its final production stage happens in Australia, a low risk country for labour abuse.
• There's no evidence it has a Code of Conduct but it has a formal statement covering workers' rights.
• It partly traces its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
• It ensures workers in the final production stage are paid a living wage, though not in its entire supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Natalija “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It appears to use silk.
• It doesn’t appear to use leather, wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Natalija “Good” overall.