Princess Polly

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: United States

Princess Polly sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

3 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Princess Polly “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It follows an unsustainable ultra fast fashion model due to its quick release of trend-led styles, aggressive marketing practices, and very large number of products.
  • It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled polyester, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • There’s no evidence it’s set a target to manage water use in its supply chain.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.
  • While it offers clothing recycling to consumers, it doesn’t report on its results.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Princess Polly “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Its entire final production stage is certified by Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit - SMETA Best Practice Guidance.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • It agrees to long-term contracts with its suppliers to help provide financial security for them.
  • It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it disclosed some policies to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Princess Polly “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather and wool.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
  • It has a formal policy aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.
  • It uses few animal-derived materials.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Princess Polly “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-02-06