Seidensticker

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Dec 2023

price:
$$$$

location: Germany

Seidensticker is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Seidensticker sustainability rating

Last rated Dec 2023

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

1 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Seidensticker is owned by Seidensticker Group.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Seidensticker “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled materials.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce its climate impacts.
  • There’s no evidence it minimises textile waste in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Seidensticker “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Seidensticker “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use leather, wool, down, angora, exotic animal hair, horn, and silk.
  • It doesn’t appear to use fur, or exotic animal skin.
  • There’s no evidence it traces any animal-derived materials to the first production stage.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Seidensticker “Not Good Enough” overall.

Rated Dec 2023

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.