Smyk

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Poland

Smyk sustainability rating

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Smyk “Very Poor”. Unfortunately, Smyk does not publish sufficient information on the most critical planet issues. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Smyk “Very Poor”. Unfortunately, Smyk does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Smyk “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather and wool.
  • It doesn’t appear to use fur, angora, exotic animal skin, shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It uses few animal-derived materials.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Smyk “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-04-21