THOM BROWNE
Rated: We avoid
Last rated: Jun 2022
price:location: United States
THOM BROWNE is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.
THOM BROWNE sustainability rating
Suggest a rating update
Planet
People
Animals
Overall rating: We avoid
Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate
THOM BROWNE is owned by Ermenegildo Zegna Group.
Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals.
Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has a Code of Conduct. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. There is no evidence it implements practices to encourage diversity and inclusion in its direct operations or supply chain. It traces some of its supply chain. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.
Its animal rating is 'very poor'. It has a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy. It uses leather, wool, down, fur, exotic animal skin and exotic animal hair. It does not use angora. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.
THOM BROWNE is rated 'we avoid' overall.
Rated Jun 2022
Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.
