Weird Fish

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Jul 2022

price:
$$$$

location: United Kingdom

Weird Fish does not communicate sufficient information about its labour policies.

Weird Fish sustainability rating

This brand was last rated July 2022. The assessment is likely outdated.
Suggest a rating update

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Weird Fish's environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste.

Its labour rating is 'very poor'. It does not publish sufficient relevant information about its labour policies to give a higher rating. As a shopper you have the right to know how its products impact on its workers.

Its animal rating is it's a start. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather and wool. It does not use down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin or exotic animal hair. There is no evidence it traces any animal products to the first stage of production.

Weird Fish is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Rated Jul 2022

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.