Accessorize

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: United Kingdom

Accessorize is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Accessorize sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Accessorize is owned by Adena Brands.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Accessorize “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials, and it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • It doesn’t engage with stakeholders on critical water issues.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taken any action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Accessorize “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Much of its final stage is located in low risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Accessorize “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It has a formal policy aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.
  • It appears to use leather, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, and other animal products.
  • Some of its animal-derived materials consist of recycled or certified alternatives to conventional cashmere, wool, mohair, and alpaca.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling or down.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Accessorize “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-07-10