Falconeri

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: Italy

Falconeri is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Falconeri sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Falconeri is owned by Calzedonia Group.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste when manufacturing its products. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it has set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. None of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 11-20% in the Fashion Transparency Index. It likely publishes some information about its supplier policies and audits. It does not publish a list of suppliers or information about forced labour, gender equality or freedom of association. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather, fur, down and wool. It does not use angora, or exotic animal skin. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.

Falconeri is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated January 2021