Image credit: Hollister

Hollister

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: United States

Hollister is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Hollister sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Hollister is owned by Abercrombie & Fitch.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence that it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. It reuses some of its offcuts to minimise textile waste. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. None of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 21-30% in the Fashion Transparency Index. It likely publishes information about its supplier policies, audits and remediation processes. It does not publish a comprehensive list of suppliers or information about forced labour, gender equality or freedom of association. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has an animal welfare policy. It uses leather and wool. It uses down accredited by the Responsible Down Standard. It does not use fur, angora or exotic animal skin. There is no evidence it traces any animal products to the first stage of production.

Hollister is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated August 2020