MANFIELD

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Netherlands

MANFIELD is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

MANFIELD sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


MANFIELD is owned by Termeer Group.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate MANFIELD “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it uses any lower-impact materials.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it minimises solvent-based chemicals, which can be harmful to workers and the environment in production.
  • It takes meaningful action to reduce emissions from transportation and distribution.
  • While it offers clothing recycling to consumers, it doesn’t report on its results.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate MANFIELD “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Much of its final stage is located in low risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • There’s no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • The brand claims to audit some of its supply chain but doesn’t specify what percentage.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate MANFIELD “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather and wool.
  • It doesn’t appear to use fur, exotic animal skin, shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
  • It has a formal policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate MANFIELD “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-10-03