Michael Kors

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: United States

Michael Kors sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Michael Kors is owned by Capri Holdings.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Michael Kors “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials, and it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • It’s published a biodiversity protection policy that applies to some of its supply chain.
  • It uses Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified packaging.
  • While it offers resale of secondhand products, there’s no evidence it’s taking further action to address textile waste in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Michael Kors “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It sources its final stage of production from countries with high risk of labour abuse.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • It has initiatives to empower vulnerable women and girls in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Michael Kors “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather, shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, down, angora, decorative exotic feather, and other animal products.
  • It doesn't appear to use fur.
  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Michael Kors “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-02-03