Nicholas K

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Mar 2023

price:
$$$$

location: United States

Nicholas K is a fashion label with an edgy and experimental aesthetic.

Nicholas K sustainability rating

This brand was last rated March 2023. The assessment is likely outdated.
Suggest a rating update

Planet

3 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Nicholas K “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials.
  • It produces long-lasting products.
  • There’s no evidence it minimises textile waste in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Unfortunately, Nicholas K does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Nicholas K “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use leather, wool, and exotic animal hair.
  • It doesn’t appear to use down, fur, angora, or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Nicholas K “Not Good Enough” overall.

Rated Mar 2023

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.