brand cover image

Aritzia

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: Canada

Aritzia is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Aritzia sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Aritzia's environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including organic cotton. There is no evidence that it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste when manufacturing its products. There is no evidence it has set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. Little of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 21-30% in the 2021 Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It disclose some policies and safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. It has a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy. It uses wool, leather and exotic animal hair. It uses down accredited by the Responsible Down Standard. It does not use fur, angora or exotic animal skin. It traces some animal products to the first stage of production.

Aritzia is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated January 2022