Image credit: Fendi

Fendi

Rated: It's a start

price:
$$$$

location: Italy

Fendi is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Fendi sustainability rating

Planet

4 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: It's a start

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Fendi is owned by LVMH.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Fendi “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact materials, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.
  • To minimise waste, it recycles some of its textile offcuts.
  • It uses Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified packaging.
  • It claims to use Leather Working Group certified tanneries but doesn’t specify details about its certification.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Fendi “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Its final production stage happens in medium risk countries for labour abuse, however it doesn't publish an aggregate breakdown of supplier locations.
  • It provides a confidential complaints mechanism for workers in its supply chain to report suspected modern slavery.
  • It provides a confidential complaints mechanism for workers in its supply chain to report harassment or violence.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • It claims to have a program to improve wages but there’s no evidence it ensures its workers are paid living wages in most of its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Fendi “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather, shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, down, crocodile skin, fur, snakeskin, and other animal products.
  • Some of its animal-derived materials consist of recycled or certified alternatives to conventional cashmere and wool.
  • It has a formal policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Fendi “It's a Start” overall.

Last updated 2026-10-12