brand cover image

Carolina Herrera

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: United States

Carolina Herrera is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

Carolina Herrera sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Carolina Herrera is owned by Puig.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It does not use eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste. It has set an absolute target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated from its own operations but not its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. None of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 11-20% in the 2021 Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather, exotic animal hair and wool. It does not use fur, angora, down or exotic animal skin. There is no evidence it traces any animal products to the first stage of production.

Carolina Herrera is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated January 2022