Sebago is owned by BasicNet.
Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Sebago “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- It uses few lower-impact materials.
- There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce its climate impacts.
- There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
- There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Sebago “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- It doesn't disclose where its final production stage occurs.
- There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
- The brand claims to audit some of its supply chain but doesn’t specify what percentage.
- Its Code of Conduct covers ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
- There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
- During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.
Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Sebago “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
- It appears to use leather, wool and down.
- It doesn’t appear to use fur, angora, exotic animal skin or exotic animal hair.
- There’s no evidence it traces any animal-derived materials to the first production stage.
Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Sebago “Not Good Enough” overall.